So sayeth Ontheedge, fabricator of fake emails and Loch/CDEx stories or lore:
Posted by: ontheedge01
In reply to: d4diddy who wrote msg# 7963 Date:2/9/2006 3:54:52 AM
Post #of 12184
d4diddy:
1. I did a word search on patent application 10/268678 and did not find the word "revolutionary" in the document---perhaps you are looking at a version edited by your buddy, Henry Blair. The truly unique aspect of CDEX's work is the discovery (not found by any other research group until CDEX revealed it) that certain co-existing materials that are detectable by x-ray fluorescence are present in all explosives manufactured by all countries in existing landmines.
2. 2. Valimed does not differentiate between sterility and non-sterility, nor does it claim to do so diddy. You like to add your flavor to things to give a different impression of the real facts. Can you produce one fact where Valimed claims it can? No, would be the correct answer. If you could have filled in the blanks of your little test, you would have been able to understand that once bacteria begin to grow in the medication, or when alterations (changes, in case you try and alter the meaning of the word ) in its compounded structure occur, Valimed does measure the resultant altered composite signature as a change from the original.
3. Cdex never used the word revoltionary in the patent, why is it you want it used? Also, why do you want to give the impression that Valimed has claimed it can differentiate between sterility and non-sterility, to do so is to try and lie about what Valimed has said, vesus what diddy has twisted.
1) Question for you diddy, now relax, I am not going to ask you to fill in the blanks, I know you can't, but knowing that you were not at the booth in Vegas to hear cisco ( either him or his buddy, flash, flash, oh my my, ) try and buy a unit with a credit card, did you ever stop to think that the show units were just that----show units---and not loaded with either a full complement of optical components or a full standard database of signatures. I know you as a real executive type professional, would ask that very question to the person you were visiting with. Did cisco ( or his buddy fail to tell us that this was explained to him? In fact, conversations with anyone who has "real" actual questions, start out with telling the looker that very thing. Thus, a sale of a show unit to him, Cisco, (or his bud, flash,flash )would have been inappropriate at that time, and this was explained in detail to Mr. Credit card man. He was never told that the NDVU was in the "prototype" or "testing" stage (at least not by anyone knowledgeable on the sales team while he was standing there.) But diddy, if Mr. Credit Card man has enough buying power on his credit card, Baxa will gladly accepted his card at any time with standard BAXA delivery, warranty, and installation support. I hope he gives BAXA's sales team a call today. At the show, cisco, ( or his buddy, flash flash, camera's are a wonderful thing ) appeared somewhat flaky and not quite, shall we say, serious, about really wanting to purchase a unit. This was a dead give away to me when he offered his credit card, how unprofessional is that. And now my question. Diddy, do you think cisco's ( or his buddy, flash flash ) credit card has an insufficient or sufficient limit for this machine's cost?
