My guess is the biggest patent filed likely is one dealing with Augmented Reality, Just a guess, maybe off track, but if the case I wouldn't want to part with a single freakin 'share, if Hayes and PwC aren't legally bound to retire shares ,and looks to be the case, perhaps they have good reason to not part with shares if they so chose, I wouldn't blame them.
Like a few of us have said what they do with those shares retire or not has no impact on retail shareholders.
Google Glass was an AR device but was limited in what it could do and didn't prove popular following its launch last year. . Looked like a cyborg, but not contact lens!!
With AR, where you see through the lens and you're actually expected to wear it during the day, all day, walking around, crossing the street; that is a very different form factor and use case than VR
VR it's more using it in your own home or office setting, more inside of rooms, less about running across the street wearing your VR glasses. That isn't the challenge VR has to overcome to be successful. Whereas with AR, that is the challenge. AR needs to get it to a point where it works as well as our glasses, (contact lens!!!??)and that it's our replacing our glasses or somehow sitting over top without it being too cyborg-like, so we're not too conscious of it.
Perhaps EPGL has this covered with partners???
Just a thought..,
