InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 112680
Next 10
Followers 6
Posts 270
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/23/2014

Re: lesgetrich post# 65487

Thursday, 10/08/2015 9:23:27 PM

Thursday, October 08, 2015 9:23:27 PM

Post# of 112680
I know you read the text, so you understand that Reg FD does not require trading to have occurred for their to have been a violation by the company disclosing information. I'm not sure why you are stating the opposite.

It clearly states that companies should not disclose material information to holders of the company stock where it is reasonably foreseeable they may trade. This in no way places a requirement that trading must occur, only that it is reasonable that it could.

Given you are a holder of MCIG and are probably the most vocally active investor, constantly researching and gathering information that will help you make smart decisions with your investments, and that MCIG is well aware of your activities, it is reasonably foreseeable that you could trade MCIG stock in the future after receiving information.

I know you'll disagree and convince yourself you're right and I'm wrong. I'm ok with that. Go ahead if it makes you feel better.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent BTZI News