Zalemark Holding Co Inc (ZMRK)

[fact-checker]

DD from a national credit reporting agency (from June of this year) states the following:
(I am not going to re type everything put will capsulize the content...FC)

"GENERAL REMARKS:
Attempts to contact Steven Zale were without success. Numerous messages left on his personal voicemail remain unanswered.
ANTECEDENTS:
Zalemark Holding Company Inc. was incorporated under Delaware State laws on March 23,1999. On December 23, 2009, the corporation qualified to operate under California State laws (Charter #C3264532). A check with the California Secretary of State on March 10, 2015, showed the corporate charter as suspended.

Steven Zale previously appeared at interest in Zalemark, Inc., which was incorporated under California State laws on September 26, 2002. On February 14, 2011, Zalemark, Inc., filed a petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. (Case #11-11877). On March 8, 2012, the United States Bankruptcy Court granted an order closing the bankruptcy case. A discharge was not applicable. Zalemark, Inc. , subsequently discontinued operations in February 2011, leaving unpaid trade obligations."

My question is; why is the bankruptcy not noted in the Timeline?

The unpaid trade obligations would have included licensees like Hearst Corporation, Badgley Mischka, etc. etc. plus numerous private money investors totaling millions of dollars.

Zalemark and Steven Zale love press releases that show positive, forward thinking news and they will always stay silent (which to me is thunderous) about what the reality really is. They could answer all of the questions and allegations that have been posted but they have chosen not to because they have nothing positive to say.