InvestorsHub Logo

rsh

Followers 21
Posts 2268
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/28/2015

rsh

Re: DFF post# 8470

Friday, 10/02/2015 3:04:38 PM

Friday, October 02, 2015 3:04:38 PM

Post# of 21159
I think you have hit the nail on the head but backwards! HYSR is not a bill of goods as it is a good technology but to expect all of the issues to be resolved soon are probably not realistic. Going from 1.23 V to 1.4, 1.5, 1.55 etc. is very nice. But the exuberance of getting to 1.7 V and above may be irrational! In science nothing is really linear for long. The atomic potentials necessary to raise the voltage are non-linear meaning they get harder to accomplish with each voltage increase. Clearly, there is an upper limit to that voltage that will take forever to try and achieve (which is why it is non-linear). It is not like you can just slap on a new coat of paint on the particles and voila 2.0 V! Without 1.7 V and greater production of large amounts of H2 are not economical. The question is what is the voltage vs. H2 concentration relationship. Then one needs a duck running on a belt (even a mouse will do) to pump that H2 from a plastic bag to somewhere useful. If you think about it there are many applications from direct use, combining with CO2, storage, etc. There is a lot to do and that takes time and a lot of work. The current state of HYSR is no where near ready for a Toyota type need or even for a FC battery cell phone.
I think expectations are way too high for time periods that are far too short before the word revenue or value comes into the picture. The need for Hydrogen isn't going away any time soon - maybe a billion years or so.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent HYSR News