let's go back to the facts and what we do know ...
rth et al. is in serious breach of contract ... a) no $5,000,000 payment to uspr b) no plant built at 29 palms, ca. c) fraudulant documents stating rth had the funds to build the plant (when they did not)
uspr unilaterally terminated agreement due to the breach of contract and fraudulant activities
rth et al. sued uspr for shares despite being in breach of contract
AND NOW WE GET TO THE CURRENT SITUATION ....
uspr answered lawsuit agressively and filed a countersuit alleging fraudulant activities occurred involving rth et al. including individuals as well as rth ... as i understand it including pane, altieri, spano, and others ... and are countersuing these individuals as well as the corporate entities
AT NO POINT DOES RTH ET AL. DENY THE BREACH OF CONTRACT.
let's remember .... anyone can sue anyone for anything ... doesn't mean it will ever get to trial
imo, this ends with a summary judgment against the plaintiffs ... and uspr may not waste time going proceeding with the countersuit ...
