| Followers | 375 |
| Posts | 16984 |
| Boards Moderated | 4 |
| Alias Born | 03/07/2014 |
Friday, October 02, 2015 11:56:36 AM
Quote BS LOL, "the stock is GOING UP, it's like a textbook case study in LONG INVESTING, but all the supposed, imaginary "DIRE NEWS" seems to have all been wrong- and the common shares just keep holding up, regardless of the millions shorted????? WOW!!!!!!!!!! "
WHAT??????????? The stock has NEVER, EVER "gone up" since it began trading public?????? WHEN? WHEN WAS THAT? It's lost approx 99% of the common share value since it began trading public (STRAIGHT to the OTC as the KACHINA DOLL COMPANY OF UTAH, of course, LOL !!!!) - at $5 a share, to a split adjusted barely 4 CENTS a share today? $5 DOLLARS to 4 CENTS IS NOT "up" or "Green" in any way, shape or form?????? Mathematically IMPOSSIBLE?
Further damage to the common shareholders has resulted from MASSIVE common share dilution- which dilutes away any "ownership" a common shareholder would have or have had. ACTC/OCAT has diluted out the common shares to a literal 4 BILLION plus shares, split adjusted, while at the same time the common share price underwent MASSIVE DECLINES as shown on the factual chart below. NOWHERE and at NO TIME have they ever produced ONE CENT of ROI to their investors, LOL? WHEN and WHERE would that have occurred- based on their common share price declines and massive dilution effects taking place????????????? MAKES NO SENSE TO ME, the claim the common shares have ever been "up" or "green" since inception???????? WHEN?????????
Here's a chart showing it in visual form- how the stock/common shares have NEVER, EVER, EVER traded "net up" or "net green" since inception as a public traded company:
NOWHERE on that mathematical/visual representation chart has ACTC/OCAT EVER been "net up" as common shares, EVER??????? WHERE, WHERE and WHEN WAS THAT supposedly, LOL !!!! $5 DOLLARS to a split adjusted 4 CENTS is a horrible, massive loss of an "investment" (GAMBLE when it's an OTC penny stock LOL !! Worse than Vegas odds IMO). But it's statistically impossible per that chart to claim the stock is net "up" or "green" EVER since it went public? It's only produced MASSIVE NET LOSSES to the common shares and common share holders. Charts don't lie- it's mathematics in graphical form.
These common shares are a textbook case study on the effect of MASSIVE, NEVER ENDING DILUTION and near total common share LOSSES, as is common on the OTC/penny stock markets IMO. CLASSIC case study- the chart says it all. Simple as that to me.
Oh, Oh, oh, it's going a LITTLE RED AGAIN, LOL !!! SOLD OFF into a micro-blip of strength above 4 CENTS (oops, $4 lousy dollars, forgot that ole pesky massive R/S reverse split thingy, LOL!!)
WHAT??????????? The stock has NEVER, EVER "gone up" since it began trading public?????? WHEN? WHEN WAS THAT? It's lost approx 99% of the common share value since it began trading public (STRAIGHT to the OTC as the KACHINA DOLL COMPANY OF UTAH, of course, LOL !!!!) - at $5 a share, to a split adjusted barely 4 CENTS a share today? $5 DOLLARS to 4 CENTS IS NOT "up" or "Green" in any way, shape or form?????? Mathematically IMPOSSIBLE?
Further damage to the common shareholders has resulted from MASSIVE common share dilution- which dilutes away any "ownership" a common shareholder would have or have had. ACTC/OCAT has diluted out the common shares to a literal 4 BILLION plus shares, split adjusted, while at the same time the common share price underwent MASSIVE DECLINES as shown on the factual chart below. NOWHERE and at NO TIME have they ever produced ONE CENT of ROI to their investors, LOL? WHEN and WHERE would that have occurred- based on their common share price declines and massive dilution effects taking place????????????? MAKES NO SENSE TO ME, the claim the common shares have ever been "up" or "green" since inception???????? WHEN?????????
Here's a chart showing it in visual form- how the stock/common shares have NEVER, EVER, EVER traded "net up" or "net green" since inception as a public traded company:
NOWHERE on that mathematical/visual representation chart has ACTC/OCAT EVER been "net up" as common shares, EVER??????? WHERE, WHERE and WHEN WAS THAT supposedly, LOL !!!! $5 DOLLARS to a split adjusted 4 CENTS is a horrible, massive loss of an "investment" (GAMBLE when it's an OTC penny stock LOL !! Worse than Vegas odds IMO). But it's statistically impossible per that chart to claim the stock is net "up" or "green" EVER since it went public? It's only produced MASSIVE NET LOSSES to the common shares and common share holders. Charts don't lie- it's mathematics in graphical form.
These common shares are a textbook case study on the effect of MASSIVE, NEVER ENDING DILUTION and near total common share LOSSES, as is common on the OTC/penny stock markets IMO. CLASSIC case study- the chart says it all. Simple as that to me.
Oh, Oh, oh, it's going a LITTLE RED AGAIN, LOL !!! SOLD OFF into a micro-blip of strength above 4 CENTS (oops, $4 lousy dollars, forgot that ole pesky massive R/S reverse split thingy, LOL!!)
Posts contain only my amateur opinions, personal views and thoughts. I discuss stocks as a hobby only. Always do one's own due diligence before investing.
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
