InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,487.03
(
0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,430.40
(
0.14%
)
Dow Jones
38,834.86
(
0.15%
)
Brent Oil
84.90
(
0.13%
)
Bitcoin
65,053.20
(
-0.13%
)
Post# of 63744
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

GoyGoy3414

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 5
Posts 187
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/14/2014

GoyGoy3414

Re: bostonseb post# 41546

Thursday, 10/01/2015 6:29:24 PM

Thursday, October 01, 2015 6:29:24 PM

Post# of 63744
You are way off Boston. AISC may be that high, but cash costs over the next year are 500-600. You realize AISC includes D&A (non cash charges) right?

They are depreciating their book value and including that in AISC.

You should only be using Cash cost per ounce. Capex will be limited they said over the next year.

And they would cut exploration if they need to.

Also having paid off some debt and having two producing mines would easily allow them to get better terms on the next round of debt.

Nicely formatted, but you clearly dont work in finance. I have worked in Rwanda for the Ministry of Commerce. Credit Suisse Private Equity and now I work in M&A for a Fortune 250 firm.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up