InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,567.19
(
1.06%
)
US TECH 100
19,828.00
(
0.95%
)
Dow Jones
39,375.87
(
0.17%
)
Brent Oil
86.78
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
57,807.90
(
2.05%
)
Post# of 63744
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

bullforever

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 13
Posts 778
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/11/2014

bullforever

Re: badge0913 post# 41576

Thursday, 10/01/2015 5:47:46 PM

Thursday, October 01, 2015 5:47:46 PM

Post# of 63744

Seems you are trying to spook investors.



I also see that way and a lot of mistakes in his calculation.

For example,

~10M of admin/corporate expenses not included in mine cash costs

and

I will assume ~800/oz AISC for both mines combined on average, assuming about 750/oz at Twangiza, and 850/oz at Namoya

.

So, he misunderstands AISC (all in sustaining cash cost) with cash cost.

If AISC is used admin/corporate expenses is included.

It seems pending BAA Namoya announcement is spooking BAA empty side watchers.

Shares are really dried out with a manner that is not price-dependent.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up