Without RA-BEAM, I presume the commercial proposition in RA becomes cloudy. Is that correct?
I think RA-BEAM is important insofar as gaining mindshare in RA. If they can show some relevant data against an anti-TNF biologic, even if it's non-inferiority, that will at least prompt people to take a second look. They can try and detail with a message of "we compare well to anti-tnf..." Otherwise, they're left to detail that they're a better tofacitinib.
I think tofacitinib is tracking towards 500 million WW this year, so as you note trying to claw away at the biologic market is more attractive than stealing share from tofacitinib.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.