ScripsAmerica Inc. (SCRCQ)

[coolerheadsprevail]

To compare one sanction against one of 32 CPAs in 32 years to a SEX molester, a murderer or Hitler is way out of bounds.

(1)
The silliness of the basis of concluding that an individual is qualified to perform within a certain role just because they "only" have one conviction for an egregious violation of trust in a similar role is precisely the point of these examples.

(2)
What is "way out of bounds" are compensated promoters such as JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and all the other members of the criminal CORE group intentionally committing securities fraud by refusing to comply with Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 and failing to disclose their compensated status because they wanted to deceive LEGITIMATE retail shareholders into thinking that they were mere "retail joes" just like everyone else...

Also I do not appreciate you referring to me as a member of the SCRC Core.

Short-term memory again? Here, let me help you, Mr. Self-Disclosed member of the criminal CORE group:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=116060950

I bought 2,000,000 shares of SCRC at about 6 cents and still own them. I have not received any remuneration from SCRC.

As explained here previously, Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 is applicable not just to direct "I am paying you to promote my company and its stock" agreements, but also to ANY agreement where dissemination of publicity is ANY form of quid pro quo where value is given by a company to a party in exchange for positive publicity. For example, if the market value of a stock is .20 and a company -- after realizing how its prior paid promoters were eviscerated after having their names disclosed in the 10Q's for being "investor relations related consultants" -- decides to simply offer these same promoters stock for a nominal amount, such as .05, and try to disguise the promotion as a cheap financing deal, well, guess what? Section 17(b) STILL applies! If a CORE knucklehead purchased 2M shares for .05/share at a time when the sp was worth .20/share, then .15/share (or $300k) is considered compensation that is subject to Section 17(b) if any part of the "financing" deal included ANY expectation whatsoever by the company to receive positive publicity from the "financier".

I simply try to report on any positive SCRC news to counter your daily negative slants on SCRC activities.

Only a pumper and flipper would view commentary on a stock in terms of "positive" or "negative". True investors in a stock care only about what is fact vs fiction and what is likely to occur vs what is unlikely to occur. The sp has lost almost 100% of its value since your BFF -- SCRC's own officially company endorsed homophobic criminal JOSEPH ZAMPETTI -- along with your fellow CORE brethren began pumping the living daylights out of SCRC back in the summer of 2013, luring LEGITIMATE (i.e. not YOU) retail shareholders to their doom. Those who heeded my warnings and took my advice to trade the predictable volatility (which I provided everyone a roadmap of via breakdowns of the restricted stock unlocking dates) have made nice bank here, whereas those who listened to you and the rest of the CORE con artists are nearly broke. Truth hurts. Deal with it.


#wolfinsheepsclothing