InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 4518
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/28/2006

Re: snayeman post# 6292

Sunday, 09/20/2015 11:46:41 AM

Sunday, September 20, 2015 11:46:41 AM

Post# of 18778
No, no, no snayeman.

Your totally wrong. There is/was no need for 'azzcovering'.

What I am claiming is that they haven't told us and won't tell us, what the plan is.

Peter did spend a huge amount of money on shares, not piddly.

And it also won't cover their 'azz' in a court of law, there only their actions count.

They cannot benefit down the road if they all bought shares like we did. SEO paid even more than the recent low.

So your attribution is not clearing up anything. Just negativity. It does not make sense what you claim.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.