Saturday, September 19, 2015 3:03:55 PM
By proposing a 100 for 1 reverse split they will not overcome the problem of running up to the limit of authorized shares. By enacting a reverse split of 100 for 1 they also effectively reduce the authorized shares at the same time down to 30 million. And if they find they bumped g against the ceiling of authorized shares already, the reverse split proposal by itself does not help them. Seems they need to do both if they need to do the reverse split for the sake of selling more notes to the loan sharks.
Recent ERHE News
- Form SC 13G - Statement of acquisition of beneficial ownership by individuals • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/06/2024 07:31:22 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/08/2023 09:06:42 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/28/2023 05:35:35 PM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM
VPR Brands (VPRB) Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial Results • VPRB • May 17, 2024 8:04 AM
ILUS Provides a First Quarter Filing Update • ILUS • May 16, 2024 11:26 AM