The only Q-Dot Manufacturer even referencing an increased Temperature tolerance is "QMC" and we all know that it is 500 Deg F. So Yes all other Q-Dot available now and futures are "Silent on the Subject. They are scrambling to catch up. You can bet they would scream from the roof tops if they had anything close, equal to or better than.
There have been many discussions about CADMIUM. It will be banned totally. The "EU" had changed their original position on Cadmium due, I think of knowledge that QMC had Q-Dots that were cadmium free, and were forced to pull support from their UK Manufacturer NANOCO. The vote is scheduled for October. If you were able to Procure any display containing Cadmium, One will have a heck of a time to dispose of it upon failure , if at all.
The Annual report should shed light on the JDA and conversion of NDA's to JDA's. Often times when technology improves you will see Manufacturer's leap frog each other, as in this case.
The improvements of printing Q-Dot Ink onto photo voltaic's at high rates of speed roll to roll "Up to 600 meters/min" even if they achieve 25 % of that claim is 150 meters/min, is absolutely huge. Couple the QMC Q-Dot ability to tune photo voltaic's to convert "UV @ 5% and IR @ 50% of the non visible light available with no sunlight is "Huge". All other Q-Dot Manufacturers are again totally silent on the subject as well.
In the End, we are all stepping up, we all are making a contribution to share in the discussion Due Diligence for all to make the most informed decision analysis possible. Safe to say that we are in good company here....Let's Drive On. I am very optimistic for 2016. I take solace in the point where QMC is, knowing no one is sitting on their hands. It truly is about "Continuous Quality Improvement" and achieving "Six Sigma" (Zero Defects).
REgards
Sunny:>)))
AI
