Wednesday, September 16, 2015 6:37:58 AM
Can you explain in simple terms how the settlement caused the company to be Rule 144 ineligible?
Or is it that those notes are not valid?
I have seen both claims.
How is it your are CERTAIN DKTS owes the lenders money? I understand being bound by a contract, but if the contract isn't valid, what is DKTS bound by?
And wouldn't the lenders be better of going after ISBG/Autry anyway for "pain and suffering", etc?
They were claiming the sky was the limit, correct?
Oh, and had I not walked away, would my agreement for the Fitty Million options have been valid?
FEATURED Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
VPR Brands (VPRB) Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial Results • VPRB • May 17, 2024 8:04 AM
ILUS Provides a First Quarter Filing Update • ILUS • May 16, 2024 11:26 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. enter Strategic Partnership to Commercialize Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology • BLO • May 16, 2024 8:13 AM
Avant Technologies to Revolutionize Data Center Management with Proprietary AI Software Platform • AVAI • May 16, 2024 8:00 AM