InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 53
Posts 1789
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/22/2015

Re: dr_lowenstein post# 164731

Friday, 09/11/2015 1:18:51 PM

Friday, September 11, 2015 1:18:51 PM

Post# of 404304

There are several rather serious errors in that analysis.



I will anxiously await to hear them. Post them here or PM me.



First, one must look at the totality of the abuse deterrent data for Targiniq. The best source of this is the FDA approved package insert.
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=targiniq+pi




Okay, what does it show different than what I said?




Second it is a serious error to do cross study comparisons and arrive at such strong conclusion, alas a problem all to often seen in these sort of debates




Comparing 'Mean Drug Liking' vs. 'Mean Drug Liking' graphs is not a serious error in anything. Targiniq is a lame ADF, and if you have proof otherwise, then post it.

"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics."

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent ELTP News