InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 84
Posts 32217
Boards Moderated 85
Alias Born 03/22/2005

Re: gfp927z post# 127

Wednesday, 09/09/2015 10:25:43 PM

Wednesday, September 09, 2015 10:25:43 PM

Post# of 488
More on demineralized drinking water -


>>> The possible adverse consequences of low mineral content water consumption are discussed
in the following categories:

• Direct effects on the intestinal mucous membrane, metabolism and mineral homeostasis or
other body functions.

• Little or no intake of calcium and magnesium from low-mineral water.

• Low intake of other essential elements and microelements.

• Loss of calcium, magnesium and other essential elements in prepared food.

• Possible increased dietary intake of toxic metals.


1. Direct effects of low mineral content water on the intestinal mucous membrane, metabolism and mineral homeostasis or other body functions

Distilled and low mineral content water (TDS < 50 mg/L) can have negative taste characteristics to which the consumer may adapt with time. This water is also reported to be less
thirst quenching (3). Although these are not considered to be health effects, they should be taken into account when considering the suitability of low mineral content water for human

151

consumption. Poor organoleptic and thirst-quenching characteristics may affect the amount of
water consumed or cause persons to seek other, possibly less satisfactory water sources.
Williams (4) reported that distilled water introduced into the intestine caused abnormal
changes in epithelial cells of rats, possibly due to osmotic shock
. However, the same conclusions
were not reached by Schumann et al. (5) in a more recent study based on 14-day experiments in
rats. Histology did not reveal any signs of erosion, ulceration or inflammation in the oesophagus,
stomach and jejunum. Altered secretory function in animals (i.e., increased secretion and acidity
of gastric juice) and altered stomach muscle tone were reported in studies for WHO (3), but
currently available data have not unambiguously demonstrated a direct negative effect of low
mineral content water on the gastrointestinal mucous membrane.

It has been adequately demonstrated that consuming water of low mineral content has a
negative effect on homeostasis mechanisms, compromising the mineral and water metabolism in
the body. An increase in urine output (i.e., increased diuresis) is associated with an increase in
excretion of major intra- and extracellular ions from the body fluids, their negative balance, and
changes in body water levels and functional activity of some body water management-dependent
hormones


.Experiments in animals, primarily rats, for up to one-year periods have repeatedly
shown that the intake of distilled water or water with TDS = 75 mg/L leads to: 1.) increased water
intake, diuresis, extracellular fluid volume, and serum concentrations of sodium (Na) and chloride
(Cl) ions and their increased elimination from the body, resulting in an overall negative balance..,
and 2.) lower volumes of red cells and some other hematocrit changes
(3).

Although Rakhmanin
et al. (6) did not find mutagenic or gonadotoxic effects of distilled water, they did report
decreased secretion of tri-iodothyronine and aldosterone, increased secretion of cortisol,
morphological changes in the kidneys including a more pronounced atrophy of glomeruli, and
swollen vascular endothelium limiting the blood flow. Reduced skeletal ossification
was also
found in rat foetuses whose dams were given distilled water in a one-year study. Apparently the
reduced mineral intake from water was not compensated by their diets, even if the animals were
kept on standardized diet
that was physiologically adequate in caloric value, nutrients and salt
composition.

Results of experiments in human volunteers evaluated by researchers for the WHO report
(3) are in agreement with those in animal experiments and suggest the basic mechanism of the
effects of water low in TDS (e.g. < 100 mg/L) on water and mineral homeostasis. Low-mineral
water markedly: 1.) increased diuresis (almost by 20%, on average), body water volume, and
serum sodium concentrations, 2.) decreased serum potassium concentration, and 3.) increased the
elimination of sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium and magnesium ions from the body. It was
thought that low-mineral water acts on osmoreceptors of the gastrointestinal tract, causing an
increased flow of sodium ions into the intestinal lumen and slight reduction in osmotic pressure in
the portal venous system with subsequent enhanced release of sodium into the bloo
d as an
adaptation response
. This osmotic change in the blood plasma results in the redistribution of body
water;
that is, there is an increase in the total extracellular fluid volume and the transfer of water
from erythrocytes and interstitial fluid into the plasma and between intracellular and interstitial

fluids. In response to the changed plasma volume, baroreceptors and volume receptors in the
bloodstream are activated, inducing a decrease in aldosterone release and thus an increase in
sodium elimination. Reactivity of the volume receptors in the vessels may result in a decrease in
ADH release and an enhanced diuresis
. The German Society for Nutrition reached similar
conclusions about the effects of distilled water and warned the public against drinking it (7). The
warning was published in response to the German edition of The Shocking Truth About Water (8),
whose authors recommended drinking distilled water instead of "ordinary" drinking water. The
Society in its position paper (7) explains that water in the human body always contains
152
electrolytes (e.g. potassium and sodium) at certain concentrations controlled by the body. Water
resorption by the intestinal epithelium is also enabled by sodium transport. If distilled water is
ingested, the intestine has to add electrolytes to this water first, taking them from the body
reserves. Since the body never eliminates fluid in form of "pure" water but always together with
salts, adequate intake of electrolytes must be ensured. Ingestion of distilled water leads to the
dilution of the electrolytes dissolved in the body water. Inadequate body water redistribution
between compartments may compromise the function of vital organs. Symptoms at the very
beginning of this condition include tiredness, weakness and headache; more severe symptoms are
muscular cramps and impaired heart rate.
Additional evidence comes from animal experiments and clinical observations in several
countries. Animals given zinc or magnesium dosed in their drinking water had a significantly
higher concentration of these elements in the serum than animals given the same elements in
much higher amounts with food and provided with low-mineral water to drink. Based on the
results of experiments and clinical observations of mineral deficiency in patients whose intestinal
absorption did not need to be taken into account and who received balanced intravenous nutrition
diluted with distilled water, Robbins and Sly (9) presumed that intake of low-mineral water was
responsible for an increased elimination of minerals from the body.
Regular intake of low-mineral content water could be associated with the progressive
evolution of the changes discussed above, possibly without manifestation of symptoms or causal
symptoms over the years. Nevertheless, severe acute damage, such as hyponatremic shock or
delirium
, may occur following intense physical efforts and ingestion of several litres of lowmineral
water (10). The so-called "water intoxication" (hyponatremic shock) may also occur with
rapid ingestion of excessive amounts not only of low-mineral water but also tap water. The
"intoxication" risk increases with decreasing levels of TDS. In the past, acute health problems
were reported in mountain climbers who had prepared their beverages with melted snow that was
not supplemented with necessary ions. A more severe course of such a condition coupled with
brain oedema, convulsions and metabolic acidosis was reported in infants whose drinks had been
prepared with distilled or low-mineral bottled water (11).
2. Little or no intake of calcium and magnesium from low-mineral water
Calcium and magnesium are both essential elements. Calcium is a substantial component of
bones and teeth. In addition, it plays a role in neuromuscular excitability (i.e., decreases it), the
proper function of the conducting myocardial system, heart and muscle contractility, intracellular
information transmission and the coagulability of blood. Magnesium plays an important role as a
cofactor and activator of more than 300 enzymatic reactions including glycolysis, ATP
metabolism, transport of elements such as sodium, potassium, and calcium through membranes,
synthesis of proteins and nucleic acids, neuromuscular excitability and muscle contraction.
Although drinking water is not the major source of our calcium and magnesium intake, the
health significance of supplemental intake of these elements from drinking water may outweigh
its nutritional contribution expressed as the proportion of the total daily intake of these elements
.
Even in industrialized countries, diets deficient in terms of the quantity of calcium and
magnesium, may not be able to fully compensate for the absence of calcium and, in particular,
magnesium, in drinking water.
For about 50 years, epidemiological studies in many countries all over the world have
reported that soft water (i.e., water low in calcium and magnesium) and water low in magnesium
is associated with increased morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD)
compared to hard water and water high in magnesium. An overview of epidemiological evidence
153
is provided by recent review articles (12-15) and summarized in other chapters of this monograph
(Calderon and Craun, Monarca et al.). Recent studies also suggest that the intake of soft water, i.e.
water low in calcium, may be associated with higher risk of fracture in children (16), certain
neurodegenerative diseases (17), pre-term birth and low weight at birth (18) and some types of
cancer (19, 20). In addition to an increased risk of sudden death (21-23), the intake of water low
in magnesium seems to be associated with a higher risk of motor neuronal disease (24), pregnancy
disorders (so-called preeclampsia) (25), and some cancers (26-29).
Specific knowledge about changes in calcium metabolism in a population supplied with
desalinated water (i.e., distilled water filtered through limestone) low in TDS and calcium, was
obtained from studies carried out in the Soviet city of Shevchenko (3, 30, 31). The local
population showed decreased activity of alkaline phosphatase, reduced plasma concentrations of
calcium and phosporus and enhanced decalcification of bone tissue. The changes were most
marked in women, especially pregnant women and were dependent on the duration of residence in
Shevchenko. The importance of water calcium was also confirmed in a one-year study of rats on a
fully adequate diet in terms of nutrients and salts and given desalinated water with added
dissolved solids of 400 mg/L and either 5 mg/L, 25 mg/L, or 50 mg/L of calcium (3, 32). The
animals given water dosed with 5 mg/L of calcium exhibited a reduction in thyroidal and other
associated functions compared to the animals given the two higher doses of calcium.
While the effects of most chemicals commonly found in drinking water manifest themselves
after long exposure, the effects of calcium and, in particular, those of magnesium on the
cardiovascular system are believed to reflect recent exposures. Only a few months exposure may
be sufficient consumption time effects from water that is low in magnesium and/or calcium (33).
Illustrative of such short-term exposures are cases in the Czech and Slovak populations who
began using reverse osmosis-based systems for final treatment of drinking water at their home
taps in 2000-2002. Within several weeks or months various complaints suggestive of acute
magnesium (and possibly calcium) deficiency were reported (34). The complaints included
cardiovascular disorders, tiredness, weakness or muscular cramps and were essentially the same
symptoms listed in the warning of the German Society for Nutrition (7).
3. Low intake of some essential elements and microelements from low-mineral water
Although drinking water, with some rare exceptions, is not the major source of essential
elements for humans, its contribution may be important for several reasons. The modern diet of
many people may not be an adequate source of minerals and microelements. In the case of
borderline deficiency of a given element, even the relatively low intake of the element with
drinking water may play a relevant protective role. This is because the elements are usually
present in water as free ions and therefore, are more readily absorbed from water compared to
food where they are mostly bound to other substances.
Animal studies are also illustrative of the significance of microquantities of some elements
present in water. For instance, Kondratyuk (35) reported that a variation in the intake of
microelements was associated with up to six-fold differences in their content in muscular tissue.
These results were found in a 6-month experiment in which rats were randomized into 4 groups
and given: a.) tap water, b.) low-mineral water, c.) low-mineral water supplemented with iodide,
cobalt, copper, manganese, molybdenum, zinc and fluoride in tap water, d.) low-mineral water
supplemented with the same elements but at ten times higher concentrations. Furthermore, a
negative effect on the blood formation process was found to be associated with non-supplemented
demineralised water. The mean hemoglobin content of red blood cells was as much as 19% lower
in the animals that received non-supplemented demineralised water compared to that in animals


154
given tap water. The haemoglobin differences were even greater when compared with the animals
given the mineral supplemented waters.
Recent epidemiological studies of an ecologic design among Russian populations supplied
with water varying in TDS suggest that low-mineral drinking water may be a risk factor for
hypertension and coronary heart disease, gastric and duodenal ulcers, chronic gastritis, goitre,
pregnancy complications and several complications in newborns and infants, including jaundice,
anemia, fractures and growth disorders (36). However, it is not clear whether the effects observed
in these studies are due to the low content of calcium and magnesium or other essential elements,
or due to other factors.
Lutai (37) conducted a large cohort epidemiological study in the Ust-Ilim region of Russia.
The study focused on morbidity and physical development in 7658 adults, 562 children and 1582
pregnant women and their newborns in two areas supplied with water different in TDS. One of
these areas was supplied with water lower in minerals (mean values: TDS 134 mg/L, calcium 18.7
mg/L, magnesium 4.9 mg/L, bicarbonates 86.4 mg/L) and the other was supplied with water
higher in minerals (mean values: TDS 385 mg/L, calcium 29.5 mg/L, magnesium 8.3 mg/L,
bicarbonates 243.7 mg/L). Water levels of sulfate, chloride, sodium, potassium, copper, zinc,
manganese and molybdenum were also determined. The populations of the two areas did not
differ from each other in eating habits, air quality, social conditions and time of residence in the
respective areas. The population of the area supplied with water lower in minerals showed higher
incidence rates of goiter, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, gastric and duodenal ulcers,
chronic gastritis, cholecystitis and nephritis. Children living in this area exhibited slower physical
development and more growth abnormalities, pregnant women suffered more frequently from
edema and anemia. Newborns of this area showed higher morbidity. The lowest morbidity was
associated with water having calcium levels of 30-90 mg/L, magnesium levels of 17-35 mg/L, and
TDS of about 400 mg/L (for bicarbonate containing waters). The author concluded that such
water could be considered as physiologically optimum.
4. High loss of calcium, magnesium and other essential elements in food prepared
in low-mineral water
When used for cooking, soft water was found to cause substantial losses of all essential
elements from food (vegetables, meat, cereals). Such losses may reach up to 60 % for magnesium
and calcium or even more for some other microelements (e.g., copper 66 %, manganese 70 %,
cobalt 86 %). In contrast, when hard water is used for cooking, the loss of these elements is much
lower, and in some cases, an even higher calcium content was reported in food as a result of
cooking (38-41).
Since most nutrients are ingested with food, the use of low-mineral water for cooking and
processing food may cause a marked deficiency in total intake of some essential elements that was
much higher than expected with the use of such water for drinking only. The current diet of many
persons usually does not provide all necessary elements in sufficient quantities, and therefore, any
factor that results in the loss of essential elements and nutrients during the processing and
preparation of food could be detrimental for them.
5. Possible increased dietary intake of toxic metals
Increased risk from toxic metals may be posed by low-mineral water in two ways: 1.) higher
leaching of metals from materials in contact with water resulting in an increased metal content in
drinking water, and 2.) lower protective (antitoxic) capacity of water low in calcium and
magnesium.
155
Low-mineralized water is unstable and therefore, highly aggressive to materials with which
it comes into contact. Such water more readily dissolves metals and some organic substances
from pipes, coatings, storage tanks and containers, hose lines and fittings, being incapable of
forming low-absorbable complexes with some toxic substances and thus reducing their negative
effects.
Among eight outbreaks of chemical poisoning from drinking water reported in the USA in
1993-1994, there were three cases of lead poisoning in infants who had blood-lead levels of 15
µg/dL, 37 µg/dL, and 42 µg/dL. The level of concern is 10 µg/dL. For all three cases, lead had
leached from brass fittings and lead-soldered seams in drinking water storage tanks. The three
water systems used low mineral drinking water that had intensified the leaching process (42).
First-draw water samples at the kitchen tap had lead levels of 495 to 1050 µg/L for the two infants
with the highest blood lead; 66 µg/L was found in water samples collected at the kitchen tap of
the third infant (43).
Calcium and, to a lesser extent, magnesium in water and food are known to have antitoxic
activity. They can help prevent the absorption of some toxic elements such as lead and cadmium
from the intestine into the blood, either via direct reaction leading to formation of an unabsorbable
compound or via competition for binding sites (44-50). Although this protective effect is limited,
it should not be dismissed. Populations supplied with low-mineral water may be at a higher risk in
terms of adverse effects from exposure to toxic substances compared to populations supplied with
water of average mineralization and hardness.
6. Possible bacterial contamination of low-mineral water
All water is prone to bacterial contamination in the absence of a disinfectant residual either
at source or as a result of microbial re-growth in the pipe system after treatment. Re-growth may
also occur in desalinated water. Bacterial re-growth within the pipe system is encouraged by
higher initial temperatures, higher temperatures of water in the distribution system due to hot
climates, lack of a residual disinfectant, and possibly greater availability of some nutrients due to
the aggressive nature of the water to materials in contact with it. Although an intact desalination
membrane should remove all bacteria, it may not be 100 % effective (perhaps due to leaks) as can
be documented by an outbreak of typhoid fever caused by reverse osmosis-treated water in Saudi
Arabia in 1992 (51). Thus, virtually all waters including desalinated waters are disinfected after
treatment. Non pathogenic bacterial re-growth in water treated with different types of home water
treatment devices was reported by Geldreich et al. (52) and Payment et al. (53, 54) and many
others. The Czech National Institute of Public Health (34) in Prague has tested products intended
for contact with drinking water and found, for example, that the pressure tanks of reverse osmosis
units are prone to bacterial regrowth, primarily do to removal of residual disinfectant by the
treatment. They also contain a rubber bag whose surface appears to be favourable for bacterial
growth.
III. DESIRABLE MINERAL CONTENT OF DEMINERALISED DRINKING WATER
The corrosive nature of demineralised water and potential health risks related to the
distribution and consumption of low TDS water has led to recommendations of the minimum and
optimum mineral content in drinking water and then, in some countries, to the establishment of
obligatory values in the respective legislative or technical regulations for drinking water quality.
Organoleptic characteristics and thirst-quenching capacity were also considered in the
recommendations. For example, human volunteer studies (3) showed that the water temperatures
of 15-350 C best satisfied physiological needs. Water temperatures above 350 or below 150 C
156
resulted in a reduction in water consumption. Water with a TDS of 25-50 mg/L was described
tasteless (3).
1. The 1980 WHO report
Salts are leached from the body under the influence of drinking water with a low TDS.
Because adverse effects such as altered water-salt balance were observed not only in completely
desalinated water but also in water with TDS between 50 and 75 mg/L, the team that prepared the
1980 WHO report (3) recommended that the minimum TDS in drinking water should be 100
mg/L. The team also recommended that the optimum TDS should be about 200-400 mg/L for
chloride-sulphate waters and 250-500 mg/L for bicarbonate waters (WHO 1980). The
recommendations were based on extensive experimental studies conducted in rats, dogs and
human volunteers. Water exposures included Moscow tap water, desalinated water of
approximately 10 mg/L TDS, and laboratory-prepared water of 50, 100, 250, 300, 500, 750, 1000,
and 1500 mg/L TDS using the following constituents and proportions: Cl- (40%), HCO3 (32%),
SO4 (28%) / Na (50%), Ca (38%), Mg (12%). A number of health outcomes were investigated
including: dynamics of body weight, basal and nitrogen metabolism, enzyme activity, water-salt
homeostasis and its regulatory system, mineral content of body tissues and fluids, hematocrit, and
ADH activity. The optimal TDS was associated with the lowest incidence of adverse effect,
negative changes to the human, dog, or rat, good organoleptic characteristics and thirst-quenching
properties, and reduced corrosivity of water.
In addition to the TDS levels, the report (3) recommended that the minimum calcium
content of desalinated drinking water should be 30 mg/L. These levels were based on health
concerns with the most critical effects being hormonal changes in calcium and phosphorus
metabolism and reduced mineral saturation of bone tissue. Also, when calcium is increased to 30
mg/L, the corrosive activity of desalinated water would be appreciably reduced and the water
would be more stable (3). The report (3) also recommended a bicarbonate ion content of 30 mg/L
as a minimum essential level needed to achieve acceptable organoleptic characteristics, reduced
corrosivity, and an equilibrium concentration for the recommended minimum level of calcium.
2. Recent recommendations
More recent studies have provided additional information about minimum and optimum
levels of minerals that should be in demineralised water. For example, the effect of drinking water
of different hardness on the health status of women aged from 20 to 49 years was the subject of two
cohort epidemiological studies (460 and 511 women) in four South Siberian cities (55, 56). The
water in city A water had the lowest levels of calcium and magnesium (3.0 mg/L calcium and 2.4
mg/L magnesium). The water in city B had slightly higher levels (18.0 mg/L calcium and 5.0 mg/L
magnesium). The highest levels were in city C (22.0 mg/L calcium and 11.3 mg/L magnesium) and
city D (45.0 mg/L calcium and 26.2 mg/L magnesium). Women living in cities A and B more
frequently showed cardiovascular changes (as measured by ECG), higher blood pressure,
somatoform autonomic dysfunctions, headache, dizziness, and osteoporosis (as measured by X-ray
absorptiometry) compared to those of cities C and D. These results suggest that the minimum
magnesium content of drinking water should be 10 mg/L and the minimum calcium content should
be 20 mg/L rather than 30 mg/L as recommended in the 1980 WHO report (3).
Based on the currently available data, various researchers have recommended that the
following levels of calcium, magnesium, and water hardness should be in drinking water:
• For magnesium, a minimum of 10 mg/L (33, 56) and an optimum of about 20-30 mg/L (49,
57);
157
• For calcium, a minimum of 20 mg/L (56) and an optimum of about 50 (40-80) mg/L (57,
58);
• For total water hardness, the sum of calcium and magnesium should be 2 to 4 mmol/L (37,
50, 59, 60).
At these concentrations, minimum or no adverse health effects were observed. The
maximum protective or beneficial health effects of drinking water appeared to occur at the
estimated desirable or optimum concentrations. The recommended magnesium levels were based
on cardiovascular system effects, while changes in calcium metabolism and ossification were used
as a basis for the recommended calcium levels. The upper limit of the hardness optimal range was
derived from data that showed a higher risk of gall stones, kidney stones, urinary stones, arthrosis
and arthropathies in populations supplied with water of hardness higher than 5 mmol/L.
Long-term intake of drinking water was taken into account in estimating these
concentrations. For short-term therapeutic indications of some waters, higher concentrations of
these elements may be considered.
IV. GUIDELINES AND DIRECTIVES FOR CALCIUM, MAGNESIUM,
AND HARDNESS LEVELS IN DRINKING WATER
The WHO in the 2nd edition of Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality (61) evaluated
calcium and magnesium in terms of water hardness but did not recommend either minimum levels
or maximum limits for calcium, magnesium, or hardness.The first European Directive (62)
established a requirement for minimum hardness for softened or desalinated water (= 60 mg/L as
calcium or equivalent cations). This requirement appeared obligatorily in the national legislations
of all EEC members, but this Directive expired in December 2003 when a new Directive (63)
became effective. The new Directive does not contain a requirement for calcium, magnesium, or
water hardness levels. On the other hand, it does not prevent member states from implementing
such a requirement into their national legislation. Only a few EU Member States (e.g. the
Netherlands) have included calcium, magnesium, or water hardness into their national regulations
as a binding requirement. Some EU Member States (e.g. Austria, Germany) included these
parameters at lower levels as unbinding regulations, such as technical standards (e.g., different
measures for reduction of water corrosivity). All four Central European countries that became part
of the EU in May 2004 have included the following requirements in their respective regulations
but varying in binding power;
• Czech Republic (2004): for softened water = 30 mg/L calcium and = 10 mg/L magnesium;
guideline levels of 40-80 mg/L calcium and 20–30 mg/L magnesium (hardness as S Ca + Mg
= 2.0 – 3.5 mmol/L).
• Hungary (2001): hardness 50 – 350 mg/L (as CaO); minimum required concentration of 50
mg/L must be met in bottled drinking water, new water sources, and softened and desalinated
water.
• Poland (2000): hardness 60–500 mg/L (as CaCO3).
• Slovakia (2002): guideline levels > 30 mg/L calcium and 10 – 30 mg/L magnesium.
The Russian technical standard Astronaut environment in piloted spaceships – general
medical and technical requirements (64) defines qualitative requirements for recycled water
intended for drinking in spaceships. Among other requirements, the TDS should range between
100 and 1000 mg/L with minimum levels of fluoride, calcium and magnesium being specified by
158
a special commission separately for each cosmic flight. The focus is on how to supplement
recycled water with a mineral concentrate to make it “physiologically valuable” (65).
V. CONCLUSIONS
Drinking water should contain minimum levels of certain essential minerals (and other
components such as carbonates). Unfortunately, over the two past decades, little research attention
has been given to the beneficial or protective effects of drinking water substances. The main focus
has been on the toxicological properties of contaminants. Nevertheless, some studies have
attempted to define the minimum content of essential elements or TDS in drinking water, and
some countries have included requirements or guidelines for selected substances in their drinking
water regulations. The issue is relevant not only where drinking water is obtained by desalination
(if not adequately re-mineralised) but also where home treatment or central water treatment
reduces the content of important minerals and low-mineral bottled water is consumed.
Drinking water manufactured by desalination is stabilized with some minerals, but this is
usually not the case for water demineralised as a result of household treatment. Even when
stabilized, the final composition of some waters may not be adequate in terms of providing health
benefits. Although desalinated waters are supplemented mainly with calcium (lime) or other
carbonates, they may be deficient in magnesium and other microelements such as fluorides and
potassium. Furthermore, the quantity of calcium that is supplemented is based on technical
considerations (i.e., reducing the aggressiveness) rather than on health concerns. Possibly none of
the commonly used ways of re-mineralization could be considered optimum, since the water does
not contain all of its beneficial components. Current methods of stabilization are primarily
intended to decrease the corrosive effects of demineralised water.
Demineralised water that has not been remineralized, or low-mineral content water – in the
light of the absence or substantial lack of essential minerals in it – is not considered ideal drinking
water, and therefore, its regular consumption may not be providing adequate levels of some
beneficial nutrients. This chapter provides a rationale for this conclusion. The evidence in terms
of experimental effects and findings in human volunteers related to highly demineralised water is
mostly found in older studies, some of which may not meet current methodological criteria.
However, these findings and conclusions should not be dismissed. Some of these studies were
unique, and the intervention studies, although undirected, would hardly be scientifically,
financially, or ethically feasible to the same extent today. The methods, however, are not so
questionable as to necessarily invalidate their results. The older animal and clinical studies on
health risks from drinking demineralised or low-mineral water yielded consistent results both with
each other, and recent research has tended to be supportive.
Sufficient evidence is now available to confirm the health consequences from drinking
water deficient in calcium or magnesium. Many studies show that higher water magnesium is
related to decreased risks for CVD and especially for sudden death from CVD. This relationship
has been independently described in epidemiological studies with different study designs,
performed in different areas, different populations, and at different times. The consistent
epidemiological observations are supported by the data from autopsy, clinical, and animal studies.
Biological plausibility for a protective effect of magnesium is substantial, but the specificity is
less evident due to the multifactorial aetiology of CVD. In addition to an increased risk of sudden
death, it has been suggested that intake of water low in magnesium may be associated with a
higher risk of motor neuronal disease, pregnancy disorders (so-called preeclampsia), sudden death
in infants, and some types of cancer. Recent studies suggest that the intake of soft water, i.e. water
low in calcium, is associated with a higher risk of fracture in children, certain neurodegenerative
159
diseases, pre-term birth and low weight at birth and some types of cancer. Furthermore, the
possible role of water calcium in the development of CVD cannot be excluded.
International and national authorities responsible for drinking water quality should consider
guidelines for desalination water treatment, specifying the minimum content of the relevant
elements such as calcium and magnesium and TDS. If additional research is required to establish
guidelines, authorities should promote targeted research in this field to elaborate the health
benefits. If guidelines are established for substances that should be in deminerialised water,
authorities should ensure that the guidelines also apply to uses of certain home treatment devices
and bottled waters.

<<<



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.