InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,431.60
(
-0.04%
)
US TECH 100
19,168.00
(
0.52%
)
Dow Jones
38,589.16
(
-0.15%
)
Brent Oil
82.28
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
66,537.47
(
0.52%
)
Post# of 104462
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

chessmite

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 33
Posts 3334
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 05/26/2010

chessmite

Re: Jamis1 post# 41480

Wednesday, 09/09/2015 9:12:37 AM

Wednesday, September 09, 2015 9:12:37 AM

Post# of 104462
one can read nanosys own words and form their own opinion.

I think it would have been more effective for you to just state your opinion and perspective.

wrt Nanosys meeting current mkt demand, (which implies only one) I imagine Nanoco and others would disagree.
Nanosys does have some revenues, but we've seen how fickle the mkt can be, (like Samsung & LG flip-flopping between QD/OLEDs or sources).

I am glad that QDX tm was designed to meet perceived shortcomings.


Looking Forward
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up