Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

In my opinion, this latest stuff about Apple being served (but of course, and as usual, no supporting evidence, while such big "news"...) is an ex of the type of hype I spoke of which is geared to prop pps. The ambiguous & esoteric nature of such claims indicates to me, that is its purpose.
.
As well, the pointing up of "2800%" pps growth, while maybe true, is in my opinion is misleading. There are a few who were fortunate to get lg amts of shares at half cent, and likely fewer who managed to zero their price point with lg number of free shares to boot. But most likely many who have not done near so well esp considering the long length of time the trend has been downward for last year to year & a half. And I think the holding pwr at 5-10 cents for so long, (certainly nothing to write home about) is purely a hype/speculation based propping up. No actual, real value has ever been demoed (likely cuz it isn't there). Thus 2800 per cent & "holding pwr" of pps, is very misleading aside from above context.
.
The most single important truth about this play, imho, which can't apparently be stated enough times.....is anything with the power & value, such as has been assigned to vplm patents, truly as "priceless" as it's been advertised, and simply as important, nay, IMPERATIVE, as it's "foundational/controlling/no get around" nature, as it's cracked up to be......OBVIOUSLY WUDDA BEEN SNATCHED UP LONG AGO! Twofold reasoning: 1) buyer becomes the god of voip & 2) if a voip service provider, you cannot avoid the simple economics of not being able to afford the infringement hits. Plain & simple facts & ones that TRULY can't be gotten around...