Monday, September 07, 2015 7:50:03 PM
"Communications between predecessor and successor accountants."
The situation that you describe involves an accountant and an auditor, not "predecessor and successor accountants".
"If, Mr. Peterson knew there was an audit being conducted by Mr. Briones, he had an obligation to contact Mr. Briones and to note such contact."
Not true.
"Actually, Mr. Peterson didn't have to make such a note, due to, there wasn't an audit being prepared by Mr. Briones."
It wouldn't matter if Briones was auditing statements prepared by Peterson, there's no requirement for an accountant to contact the auditor and hence there's obviously no requirement to note such contact in the financials.
This sentence goes nowhere. In fact, I'm pretty sure it's not a sentence:
"The original prohibition from merely typing or reproducing client-prepared financial statements by the accountant as an accommodation to a client."
This makes sense to me:
"There's not an audit being performed."
The rest of it seems wacky.
“I have had a wonderful time but this wasn't it.”
..........Groucho
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM