i challenge anyone to show one post where i defended the g/m number ...
i clearly stated that the g/ton number is consistent thruout all the assay readings and is the important number ... and if you don't like the new measurement, ignore it ....
why would i defend or even care about a posted number that anyone with a calculator can come up with...
g/ton (gold) X width (in meters) = g/m {TYPO} - should read g X m
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.