InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,447.87
(
-0.31%
)
US TECH 100
18,978.00
(
-1.19%
)
Dow Jones
39,411.21
(
0.67%
)
Brent Oil
85.30
(
0.03%
)
Bitcoin
60,232.13
(
-0.05%
)
Post# of 18904
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

gnolfinvestor

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 25
Posts 2863
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/03/2009

gnolfinvestor

Re: None

Wednesday, 09/02/2015 4:53:48 PM

Wednesday, September 02, 2015 4:53:48 PM

Post# of 18904
spoke to my geologist friend ... showed him the pr .... etc. ... his reply:

obviously, grams/meter is a typo !!! should have been grams X meters !!!

and he stated that g X m above 25 should get some attention (assuming gm/ton is above a certain base number - depends on cost of mining).

yes, could have .2 g/ton X 500 meters = 100 - but any geologist would look at g/ton first ---- the table g X m is simply doing a simple math calculation - anyone can do it.

g/m would indicate division - not multiplication
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up