InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1053
Posts 189434
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/19/2009

Re: CalderQuacks post# 119

Monday, 08/31/2015 1:39:36 PM

Monday, August 31, 2015 1:39:36 PM

Post# of 913
I can see a reason for this to trade over $2 PPS, Total liabilities ( including st+Lt are 67m).somebody mentioned they removed lt liabilities into the st liabilities,this is not true.the balance sheet always include st+lt under total liabilities.actually the balance sheet very solid due to total assets/debt ratio way over 1. $97m-$67m= $30m net assets vs 1.5m cap!!

$30m Net assets/14m o/s= $2+ PPS! (add more $12m in cash and it's almost $3 PPS).

check it out "LIABILITIES, PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY" "about the same as a year ago.even lower!!
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingPdf?FilingID=10863878

TOTAL ASSETS $ 97,710
TOTAL LIABILITIES 67,708

it means,NET ASSETS = $30M
Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,385

Market value is only $1.5M, do the math.

and this dosn't include more $12m(will be reflected on the Q3) in cash per this:

."On July 31, 2015, the Company completed the sale of its interests in the Mesa Units , located on the Pinedale
Anticline in southwestern Wyoming , to Vanguard Operating, LLC (the “Buyer”), an unaffiliated entity. The
cash purchase price was $12.0 million, subject to closing and post-closing adjustments"

My posts are my opinion and should not be used as investment advice. Make your own decisions in your stock trades.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.