NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[Nanotoday]

We do know what management said about the results and what was predicted prior to that (yes the use of "shape" is not scientific, but it was dead on accurate to the problem):

"Management is not optimistic about Ebolacide2 because the shape of the virus is not as defined and symmetrical as other viruses, so the attachment points may not be as effective."
~~Rawnoc, January 2015 at $2.69/share

"It is also likely that the NPC1-binding site on Ebolavirus glycoprotein, which is thought to be buried, may have been substantially inaccessible to our drug candidates."
~~NNVC management, May 2015

As far as your other questions, that not how sources work.

But I still don't understand why there is so much demanded from "anonymous posters" on this board when management has not been asked these same questions or held to the same level of scrutiny? They give zero or vague information and that's accepted. Posters provide near 100% accurate information and are asked "why don't you have more."

Have you asked Seymour any of these questions?

I'll work on getting you whatever answers I can.