i disagree. nobody is saying that the information in the as of yet unpublished report is inaccurate.
what i am saying is uspr calling it a 43-101 compliant report is either misleading to investors or shows a lack of knowledge from uspr's management.
whatever report they produce, whatever qp they use, whatever the report says, is NOT the point. you can't call something 43-101 compliant if it has zero chance of being 43-101 compliant. that's just logic.
nobody is discrediting a report that hasn't been done yet. i am saying uspr should not be calling it something it can't possibly be. period.
and again, it shows they are misleading or not knowledgeable. there is no other possibility.
This post is my opinion and should not be used as investment advice.
