InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 2978
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/28/2014

Re: None

Friday, 08/21/2015 11:48:27 AM

Friday, August 21, 2015 11:48:27 AM

Post# of 68424
I do enjoy the in-depth conversayion.so I’ll proceed recognizing it’s all speculation. On or about the same date in July Kaplan told “V” to recommend sanctions (note he didn’t define _ from injunction to monitory with no limits) on or about the same date he ordered by “V’s” request further discovery & for it to be produced in Sept. By doing so (happy he did) put the “V” staff in a position to determine damages before all discovery is complete. As a result “V” has to determine damages without all the facts. WEhat I believe will follow the Sept date is a request by “V” for a continuance so they may review the facts that MAY be divulged in this Sept round of discovery. To further speculate should it reveal more in-depth activity on the part of “G”(which will be huge & another NDA case)


I understand you were just pulling numbers out of the air with a little grounding relating to the 817.2 figure that’s been discussed. I would suggest now following our discussion that we inflate that number greatly and more in line with what the numbers really could be.(Think big as big corporations do, not in millions, it’s a different mind set to comprehend for us average guy’s where some struggle to make the mortgage payment you got a doctor’s bill because Johnny broke his arm.)
I suggest we talk in billion’s, hard to believe but this patent is a standard used world wide and in this NDA case the contents were released by ZTE. Now calculate the value lost, it is truly unbelievable. As a result thinking in billion’s becomes reasonable. So I would suggest (not to raise false hopes and certainly not to PUMP) that we can speculate in terms of billions.

Regardless of numbers I concur with your calculations and the factors you included in your methodology, however, regarding the process. You appropriately included market multiples (which I hadn’t considered, thank’s) but there was no inclusion of what I believe Kaplan can do punitively and hay is a 2x,3x,4x, multiple of what (damages) value ”V” places on the NDA breach . So agan with the above now taken into consideration run the number’s again.