I have come to realize that Seeking Alpha articles are often agenda driven. It is entirely possible these guys are that bad at their jobs but my guess is they are paid by shorters or people accumulating. One today came out on Ocata saying many slanderous things. I tried to respond and had it deleted. I tried to "like" a post and an error came up. This happened to other posters that were trying to post rebuttals. In my mind, that was a collective effort by a contributor and Seeking Alpha. I now trust little that comes out of their site. Are they getting paid by shorters or others, who knows? But, I do remember previous articles on CLGRF that were very misleading. Talked about them making money at the expense of down the line. Well, we are down the line and they are still making money. What was author's agenda, if one? My point at the time was that management was doing the right thing by keeping company alive even if they were going for low hanging fruit. Alternative was going down the toilet. Management did the right thing and continues to.
T