InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 88
Posts 5985
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/19/2007

Re: Alydyr post# 26499

Tuesday, 08/18/2015 11:37:30 AM

Tuesday, August 18, 2015 11:37:30 AM

Post# of 97081
No Problem with that as the 10Q's do not have to be audited compared to the 10K

The Terms are clear: Material effect or Information is then given, when it negatively Impacts the valuation of a Company or the stockprice. At the end it is the Auditor that considers wheter uncorrected and undetected mistakes have material and pervasive effect or just material and not pervasive. In simple words, as Long as the misstatements in wording or amount is minor and does not affect the Price on both sides of the game.


But of course mistakes should be corrected with the next filing and at least will have to be corrected with the audited 10K Report.

In the causa DECN

A difference of $ 196.000 divided by roughly 7.9 Mio capitalisation means 2.48 % or if the present stock Price is $ 0.15 it would mean 0.14628 a small difference of 0.00372 per share. The funny part is and must be, that the market is seeing it through my eyes as well, as the stock reacted up since the filings were issued on August 14 by 15 %.