Truthbetold, thanks for being my partner in an intelligent conversation. It is an unfortunate part of human nature that lots of folks in "anonymous" situations like discussion boards get to feel very comfortable in getting into name-calling with folks whose opinions differ from their own. While our conclusions on the stock differ, I'm pleased to be going back and forth with you in a way we could tell our kids (grandchildren in my case) "that's how we relate to others in the sandbox with us."
You've brought some new information, at least it's new to me, to the table. You wrote about "the faulty AR Mod." This would be the mod that preceded the Limitless Mod, correct? I hope that our vape shop owner on this board might provide some more history/verification here. Regarding the juice options and quality, I'd be curious as to - presuming that you're not a dealer - how you formed or became part of a community of consumers so that you have a "valid sample" when you write about "most of the people" that you know thinking that VHUB should not be in that segment of the industry.
As regards not a lot of people knowing about this stock, two thoughts:
1. Paul Knopick, the investor relations consultant, has had Kyle Winther doing lots of infomercial shows, and I think that lots of people now know about the stock but nevertheless are still staying away until there will be more clarity on VHUB's search for further equity funding (not to mention the earnings release coming in the second half of September).
2. This company is not in the marijuana industry, which on the one hand gives it some enhanced measure of "respectability" as regards the social investment community. But on the other hand, the marijuana stocks have a potential growth factor due to the wave of state legalization which VHUB does not have. ...though I do think that the explosiveness of the e-cig market per the Wells Fargo analyses which have been quoted a lot on this board is sufficient to cause momentum to build in this industry and in this stock.
Overall, I still don't think we'll be seeing 2's in this stock unless we get a nasty surprise as to pricing of new equity or unless the annual earnings report is a dud (which is entirely possible, because all the company public-focus has been on sales growth rather than on expense control). The bulls on this board have been tremendously tuned into sales growth as the reason to be a bull on the stock. Also, they've been tuned in to the stock not having been diluted to pay back debt and interest thereon, but haven't, in my opinion, fully seen that it's been more a matter of rolling over debt than of paying down debt.
As ever, time will tell as to who'll be right as to whether five cents will be seen on this stock before two (plus whatever fraction)cents. If you're right, I'll be the first to commend you, and if I'm right then I promise you zero gloating on my part.
Have a good week!
