InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 2863
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/03/2009

Re: None

Saturday, 08/15/2015 7:55:29 AM

Saturday, August 15, 2015 7:55:29 AM

Post# of 18904
a lot of hypothetical bs re: the lawsuit

first, $5,000,000 payment was NOT made = default/breach of contract

second, plant was never built at 29 palms ... therefore, not operational = default/breach of contract

third, let's not forget this was a rewrite of the original contract - because they never met any of the original deadlines - that's why it went from 300,000,000 shares to 125,000,000 shares - shows a pattern that rtc/pth never had any intention of meeting their part of the contract

fourth, does anyone really believe the bs that the reno, nevada plant will be operational --- ever ???

btw, once i knew how much gold was on the property, i was never in favor of the plasma deal ... i was ecstatic when they rewrote the deal - at least, it saved 175,000,000 shares ... did i believe plasma would ever get done - early on ....but not in the last year or so

some people said they were here for the plasma deal .... i always said i was here for the gold ....

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.