REVO directors, and supporters, read this board, goodboy.
Those directors, and their supporters, saw the detailed questions being raised on this board about the accounting treatment of the $900k 'profit' from Eyetalk365 and the 'income' from Greenwood.
It's obvious that REVO directors knew what questions to ask their professional advisors. But it appears they chose not to ask those pertinent questions before the SEC came calling.
So, it is entirely proper to focus on management when considering how the company could issue 'unreliable' statements for such an extended period of time.
After all, REVO management did not rely on any professional advisors, when producing and issuing PRs to promote their 'unreliable' statements.
