Followers | 64 |
Posts | 27978 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 12/28/2008 |
![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Thursday, August 13, 2015 12:12:42 PM
This appears to be in the Sweeny case
That is a CLAIMS case - I think
Fairholme is noted as plaintiff in this CLAIMS case
NOW
as I understand it at this juncture - on my way old by now question of what does it mean that A COURT can .........
Sweeny in this court said the Fairholme in this court can act aware of the sealed and protected information as Fairholme maneuvers in the CIRCUIT court (I assume then - they were not ejected with Perry?)
Here - the post I respond to is Perry saying in Sweeny court that they want the material Fairholme has because it applies to their case
GOV is saying no to Perry - in this court (Claims) - arguing Perry is in an appeals court that is different??????????
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • CAFI • Jun 13, 2024 8:45 AM