InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,572.85
(
0.10%
)
US TECH 100
19,951.20
(
0.53%
)
Dow Jones
39,344.79
(
-0.08%
)
Brent Oil
85.27
(
-0.18%
)
Bitcoin
56,676.94
(
-0.05%
)
Post# of 68830
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Sumdude

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 77
Posts 5771
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 04/25/2011

Sumdude

Re: Krysti post# 61526

Thursday, 08/06/2015 5:58:59 PM

Thursday, August 06, 2015 5:58:59 PM

Post# of 68830
Still not quite getting it. How can Eyetalk state

"

ALL" rights title and interest in the patents.



All to me means 100%. to my understanding clearly giving 40% of the revenue to REVO on royalty income does not inidicate "all" from my perspective.

you also said Garbage Ali and 'honest' Ron were actually the people controlling eyetalk.

i dont doubt this given their shady nature, but such a reality would be extremely damning and i would think illegal.

basically meaning, Ali and Ron floated their notes through a 3rd party to (themselves/eyetalk) and then just floated the note back to REVO. i have suspected as much for some time however...

given that i do believe this is the case, other than a strong belief from us both is there anything tangible indicating it to be true?



My name aint Buffet, im just some dude..

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up