InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 29
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2015

Re: nyt post# 27061

Wednesday, 08/05/2015 6:27:21 PM

Wednesday, August 05, 2015 6:27:21 PM

Post# of 131248
I could understand that to be the case if it were just a company driving internal business developments and continually updating shareholders (with PRs etc..) to keep a float whatever share value existed, but that is clearly not the case here with VP.

But, we have a very quite BOD, working with a very expensive legal team trying to pass extremely technical patents. That is not cheap and is definitely not easy. And, there has been clear cut contention against this effort from the likes of MS/Google/Cisco/Apple. That type of activity doesn't happen when Execs are just trying to string people along and prolong existence. We must also remember that the legal team we have wouldn't be involved if there were no light at the end of the tunnel, because IMO that's how their big money comes in.

There is definitely more to this than what we have been seeing/hearing on this board. I know it, it's just hard to feel it and sometimes difficult to continually see it with the VP BOD's PR blackout and the depleted PPS.

I think that's it for me 3/3!

Thanks GTC and NYT for the response
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News