InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 1915
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/31/2011

Re: Stock_Barber post# 98771

Wednesday, 08/05/2015 3:32:12 PM

Wednesday, August 05, 2015 3:32:12 PM

Post# of 141643
Interesting the writer of that one year old article is the founder of EV OBSESSION. the alternate reality publication.

In the true misleading journalistic spirit , he does not mention the guy from fords name. Who from Ford, the sales person from the EV department????? First they say it is not any greener then they say not significant.

Let's apply some common sense here. An ICE or a internal combustion engine is flawed by design.They lose energy through friction, moving heavy parts, heat and Idling. There is a significant advantage in using a FUEL CELL as to an ICE right off the bat. Then there is the reforming process that is used to convert natural gas to Hydrogen compared to the ICE burning fuel is also better. totaling a 50% ADVANTAGE. To take it a step further 95% of hydrogen is produced by natural gas and 52% of electricity in the U.S. comes from coal with a grid efficiency of 35%. It is easy to see why FUE CELL is the clear favorite. Now again, down the and there will be cleaner ways of producing it as time goes on.

We must stay away from biased alternative reality publications like EV OBSESSION. Here is a link from the U.S .gov't and clearly states the truth.

http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/03/f9/thomas_fcev_vs_battery_evs.pdf

JNSH is a POS. Sell on any news. At the end of the day all we have is a small time contracting company that is installing chargers and smoke detectors.