Trebeg, I think the problem is that it SEEMS you're defending intellicell's status as somehow defensible and recoverable. In January I tried to reach out to you to let you know that Andrews had nothing to do w them. I had some better sense of this because I asked while I was getting my rotator cuff surgery done there...and for which my surgeon was fantastic. Acting appropriately on your option, you did not want to hear what I had to say. What I learned about the adipose methods that had been tried there was that the results to date had berm catastrophically bad and that no one was introducing adipose-base stem cells at Andrews as of the date of my surgery. (I had mesenchymel cells and they've worked like a charm as best I can tell.)
I don't mean to sound like I'm bashing you. I'm sorry if that's how this is coming off. However, anyone that tries to create any wagon for excuses for this business only gets one reaction from me.
I don't think Vic was honest. I don't think he did what was in the best interest of the company, the shareholders, or the technology. I would love to speak w Dan Amen or others he apparently dealt with. I can't wait to see how this turns out & I'm wondering if a criminal review is forthcoming?
