XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[Ert123]

Sorry again u r wrong, V will get GVR based on TEVA https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teva_Pharmaceuticals_USA,_Inc._v._Sandoz,_Inc. PLEASE READ THe first SECTION this will b the same reason V will get a GVR this is new legal precedence.also read http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/teva-pharmaceuticals-usa-inc-v-sandoz-inc/ BUT the TEVA case was over turned at CFAC after gvr due to a claim of INDEFINTNESS. Re read the TEVA CFAC loss. reasonable certainty’ definiteness requirement under Nautilus made the invalidity holding even easier to justify. Vringo doesn't have an indefinite problem TEVA CFAC GVR ruling http://patentlyo.com/patent/2015/06/remand-deference-indefinite.html.and yes ZTE can also appeal but they have to have a basis for an appeal and what would that be? It's pretty obvious that they violated the NDA and as long as there r no errors THE APPEAL WILL B DENIED. In the meantime France ruling will have happened issuing FRAND, Germany appeal will b over and cannot b re appealed. Injunctions remain in place. In the meantime Z will have sanctions against them within the next week or so as per court filings, Z is to reply to the judge y they should not b sanctioned.