Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[chessmite]

OK, you said "We", which includes you, but I did extend the courtesy of trying to explain some of my reasoning and what it was based on......and you didn't help anyone that I know of, unless you had a chuckle at my expense

parse: analyze (a sentence) into its parts and describe their syntactic roles.

deny: state that one refuses to admit the truth or existence of.

ignore: fail to consider (something significant).

This press release was about "deep-red" "film" for lighting in "plant growth applications."
__________________________________________________________________

#40378
"salient point wrt Red CFQDs".....meaning if not up to acceptable standards, (having already taken into consideration earlier 1kg
milestone of red qds, but where are the tvs. Dow was to build S Korea based upon demand; not there yet).

I drew attention to QMC's qds and QDX tm (heat resistance to 260 C) and questioned nanoco's sp drop.

You replied #40479 with words of parse, deny, and ignore and go on to say;
"This press release was about "deep-red" "film" for lighting in "plant growth applications."

......implication being to me, that I was creating a false narrative. If you meant otherwise, I'm all ears.
__________________________________________________________________

I responded w/background info on the basis of perception wrt to "salient point wrt Red CFQDs" and question of cause of nanoco sp drop.

#40399 information from nanoco pdf page 11
On Chip
QD Integration: QDs placed directly within LED package, which is coupled to light guide
Operation temp: High 150 C
Material Useage: Low
Pros/Cons: most efficient approach; need to withstand high temps: need a cost efficient way of sealing against oxygen

.........that sounded like QDX tm meets or surpasses stated needs

I also highlighted the article form July 16
Nanoco Forms New Lighting Division to Answer Growing Demand for Cadmium-Free Quantum Dot Innovations
The new division is part of the company’s business expansion strategy to accelerate commercialization and further development in its four key target markets – electronic display, LED lighting, biological imaging and solar power


...../and the one from July 31, (after sh requested an update explaining sp drop)

Nanoco making “very significant progress” in display industry, investors reiterate ‘strong buy’ rating

By Wan Fan | July 31, 2015 07:58 GMT | London/Europe

Published on Thursday, the progress report said that Nanoco was making “significant progress” in the display industry. The company also confirmed that it supplies 11 displays OEMs with its quantum dots for large screen televisions and tablets. It works with LG, the multinational electronics company, and other firms in South Korea, China, Japan, Taiwan and the US.

Nanoco’s stock price is still recovering from the news that US rival, Nanosys, entered an agreement with Samsung, the global
electronics firm. Investors were particularly concerned that the Nanosys-Samsung deal would include patents for cadmium-free quantum dots, Nanoco’s area of expertise.
http://newmaterialsnews.com/top-stories/nanoco-making-very-significant-progress-in-display-industry-investors-reiterate-strong-buy-rating

I pointed out that from the article on the 16th that they planned to use the deep-color red cfqds in electronics displays or continue to work on making significant progress.
The reasoning had to do w/nanoco's metric of 150 C referenced in their pdf, (as that may be the one mfgs would prefer if available).


Your response #40401 "Sadly, but not surprisingly, you weren't able to follow the post."

LOL, that's your best response as an intellectual that works in the field?? No information to support your opinion or to help other board members here? Really?

....apt avatar


.......Moving On