Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Dollars1]

No, they just added in wording for the other parties from the other cases that Sweeney recently approved to have access. Before, it was just Fairholme.

Here's part of it.

1. Parties. For the purposes of this Protective Order, the term “party” or “parties” shall refer only to the plaintiffs in Fairholme Funds, Inc. et al v. United States (No. 13-465C, Fed. Cl.), Cacciapalle, et al. v. United States (No. 13-466C, Fed. Cl.), Reid v. United States (No. 14-152C, Fed. Cl.), Washington Federal, et al. v. United States (No. 13-385C, Fed. Cl.), Fisher v. United States (No. 13-608C, Fed. Cl.), Rafter v. United States (No. 14-740C, Fed. Cl.), and Arrowood Indemnity Company, et al. v. United States (No. 13-698C, Fed. Cl.) (the Actions”) and defendant, the United States, including its agencies. For the purposes of this Protective Order, the term “party” shall also include the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). The inclusion of FHFA in this definition does not imply or state that FHFA is a defendant, or that FHFA is a Government actor for all purposes. For purposes of this Protective Order, the term “producing party” includes non-parties that produce material that has been designated as Protective Information.