Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[IKABB]

The article's argument of how software patents are worthless itself is flawed for the simple reason that in one sentence it mentions how Cisco made $600 mill from Technicolor in licensing it's patents in a very secretive deal and in the next sentence it goes on to tell how VP's patents aren't enforceable and worthless.

I for one am very happy to see VP mentioned in a un-solicited article being compared to Cisco, who happens to be a huge infringer of VP. And, if VP's patents are worthless, why would anyone be writing about them at all? Furthermore, if that we're the case, why would the top patent law firm in the country be representing VP, very aggressively at that?

The Alice101 law mentioned in the article specifically relates to certain types of software algorithms, which IMO VP's patent are not.

I'm not expecting to have any one of these questions answered. Who knows, IMO Could just be a simple case of one refusing to see what is as plain as day for others.

Have a great evening!