Monday, July 27, 2015 5:45:29 PM
Why would they be? All they have to do is let them both die on the vine. Neither company has demonstrated the ability to sell product. MCIG is a wanna be distributor; VTCQ is a one trick pony. Neither have anything disruptive...and neither have proven ability to sell product.
The excuse of being a young company has run its course.
The fluffy PRs have run their course.
The "wait a year" line has run its course.
The only thing that will make these stock shares go up in price is sales at this point - because noone believes Paul anymore.
IMO, the next financials being release have to exceed expectations - and hopefully, the numbers aren't cooked.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM