InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 978
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/04/2014

Re: Sumdude post# 61045

Friday, 07/24/2015 5:11:01 PM

Friday, July 24, 2015 5:11:01 PM

Post# of 68825
It's total bs. REVO thinks fiduciary responsibility does not apply to them. They always have. The only entities they work for are the note converters and (indirectly) the flippers. Now it seems even they have been let down. I would be in hiding too if I were revo

The settlements are next to meaningless now. The stock isn't tradeable (REVO's main business model) and furthermore REVO does not file publicly. What are the settlements worth? Future value? Royalties? A bag of Skittles?

What happens if Eyetalk takes an "infringer" all the way to trial? Recent judgements have not been so favorable to patent trolls. Even if they did win the lengthy process of trial judgement, there would still be an appeal by the alleged infringer(s). By then this ticker will be gone. REVO directors have shown no evidence they are capable of responding to the SEC properly and getting this back to open trading

The difference between REVO and a real company: REVO conducts business by gifting shares and filing lawsuits through a 3rd party. Real companies don't talk about the future for ten years with no tangible result or product. They have nothing. Not even a prototype. But some people are still drinking the kool-aid. It's baffling

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.