btm, would you honestly update your SHs with that type of SM post? Do you even consider that a way to do business? Why would the HJOE company CEO refer to people here or on other message forums and then label them? This is the type of juvenile stuff I've seen from the company, along with some awful tweets that were butchered beyond comprehension. That's not a business ethic or tactic you use if you're trying to operate a "real" organization. Look at my alias to determine how I may know this. That doesn't mean HJOE cannot answer allegations that what they are producing isn't disingenuous, they do that by filing the appropriate documents, staying current with them, and providing SHs with as much transparency that legitimate NDAs allow (if they exist).
HJOE responding to negative sentiment can just lend credence to the thought process that what you're seeing is not what you're getting. Take for example the pictures from 7-11. Terrific, they've got a few boxes in the store. One store? Five stores? How many? How many boxes? If you're going to be legitimate, provide information to SHs. Is there an NDA in telling us how many cartons were placed in the store? It matters, very much. You see, if they've simply sent three or four cartons, it's going to net them very little in the long run and just shows us an illusion that they're doing business. Now, if they show us case after case in their pictures going into multiple stores, we've got something cookin'. That doesn't mean it isn't going to happen, but you must admit that many of us are in the dark here with simple things that can shed some light.
I don't harbor negative sentiment to the company. Actually, I own shares and support them. As they make money, if they make money, I make money. However, you must admit, they do need to patch up several holes before they can be viewed as a potential, serious runner and threat in the OTC.
