I guess you do not understand the concept of credibility. Let me see if I can explain it.
If someone ( in this case the management of ESFS and those who help promote their statements ) repeatedly makes claims that later turn out to be false, then, future claims will not be believed.
Those who have been proven to not have been telling the truth will not be believed in the future. Their claims have to be independently verified. And they are the ones that have to go out of their way to verify it. It is not the outside party the one that has to go out of its way to verify it. The outside party just ignores the claim.
this is why the stock is not moving and will not move. ESFS, as it has done in the past, fails to verify claims. Period. There is no reason why anybody should believe any of these claims and nobody will.
Besides an arduous process of verification, the only way investors can be lured back in would be my market factors in the price of the stock. In other words, failing a complex and time consuming process of verification, only long term upward movement in the price of the stock via volume can possibly do the trick.
That would have to start with the insiders, family, friends, acquaintances, business associates, et cetera doing a lot of buying. These people, due to their nearness to the situation would automatically have access to verification information, and if the news was good, of course, they would buy. The changes in technical factors over a period of time would lead those without easy access thereof to determine that there is a reason to buy. This is the concept of price function as a determining factor as to the validity or value of anything.
I hope I made it clear.
