InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 3709
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/02/2013

Re: rusty8350 post# 66308

Tuesday, 07/21/2015 2:50:26 PM

Tuesday, July 21, 2015 2:50:26 PM

Post# of 102937
I agree that the PRs stated that SUTI purchased 2% of CANNA. Presumably this is 2% ownership of the business.

What is not known:

What consideration was paid by SUTI in return for that 2% stake. Cash? SUTI stock? Promises by Eddie that he will mop up at night? None of this has been revealed.

As any small business person knows, even assuming that there is a profit (unlikely after the federal tax burden kicks in) then there are a million ways that the operating partners can manipulate the bottom line to show a bottom line of 0. Someone drew a parallel to a movie star accepting a percentage of the NET. There is never a NET.

If you don't know how that's done then ask any 8 year old that has operated a lemonade stand.