InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 420
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/17/2006

Re: coinstarz post# 2089

Tuesday, 06/13/2006 12:59:42 AM

Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:59:42 AM

Post# of 6488
Very interesting DNA's footprint in CA

could not garner the muscle needed for TRCA's case. Wasn't the judge a US District therefore Fed, therefore looks like WE are paying and possibly getting our money's worth, lol.

My favorite line fm the ruling/sec filing:

"Her ruling also indicated that the complaint should establish that the requisite false statements were disseminated to consumers of Increlex™, e.g., the physicians who purchase and prescribe Increlex, rather than solely to investors."

Doesn't that basically say "Y'all need to do better homework before wasting my time, let it go or go bother somebody else." ?? lol ??

Based on TRCA's last QTRLY and Annual, TRCA's legal expenses were going to consume 32-37% of cash on hand? Please correct me if I'm wrong...Now they want to keep paying the lawyers to rekindle this in VA??..nothing but desparation, imho.

S

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INSM News