The Aussies seem to be indicating a preference of using AMDL as part of their name. It was in AMDLAustralia and they have kept the AMDL-diagostics parked and dumped the Radient-diagnostics site.
All of the FDA information was for AMDL INC so they would have some continuity in name. It does appear they are claiming world wide distribution which eliminates any current agreements with UNI or GCDX. The IVD testing they are indicating appears to use a hand held device and not the 64 well testing machines.
You are correct about no mention of Radient in any way so this is certainly not an attempt to revive Radient but it is indeed a conflict of interest since the same people are involved in both situations.
IMO, this new effort is just "throwing something against the wall to see if anything sticks".
I have never shorted nor intend to have any financial interest in this stock. I am not connected with anyone who trades, shorts or has financial interests in this stock. I only post facts and my opinions. I do not post on IHUB with different aliases.