InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 75
Posts 13290
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/13/2009

Re: HMB2010 post# 8485

Saturday, 07/18/2015 11:17:10 AM

Saturday, July 18, 2015 11:17:10 AM

Post# of 10055
HMB: We know for sure that did not happen:
1. It would have been illegal because it requires all shareholders receive a 10 day notice.
2. The preferred shares had no voting power.
3. No notice of a vote was filed with the SEC.
4. The original 'bylaws' would not have applied after February 1, 2010.
5. Soon-Shiong did not own a super-majority voting block.
6. Soon-Shiong most certainly did not 'go dark.'

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1335294/000117120010000106/i00039_keyon-8k.htm

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1335294/000117120010000108/i00040_keyon-8k.htm

“It ain’t so much the things we don’t know that get us into trouble. It’s the things we know that just ain’t so.” Henry Wheeler Shaw

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.