InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 2794
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/06/2003

Re: chipguy post# 7685

Monday, 06/30/2003 11:44:01 AM

Monday, June 30, 2003 11:44:01 AM

Post# of 97747
chipguy, we are almost on the same page, but your are just mixing names a little bit. Look what you've said:

The (1) chips that came soon after the (2) were much faster than all these (3) but were too expensive and power hungry for PC applications and were used in engineering workstations and servers priced at $10k and up.


Now just pick from the list to substitute (1) (2) and (3):

1. Opteron
2. Itanium
3. Xeon
4. P4
5. Alpha

and throw any chip that fits the (1) position into the trashbag of the nishe submarkets.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News