InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 760
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/18/2006

Re: mouton29 post# 14047

Thursday, 07/16/2015 1:39:19 PM

Thursday, July 16, 2015 1:39:19 PM

Post# of 20689
Mouton, On pacer.gov under CAFC case 14-1276 no mention of the brief from SG due on July 13th is listed so I may not be looking in right place yet. Re speculation as to the delay being requested by the SG because they were too busy here is the reason they requested a delay from 6/11/15 filing:

<<The questions posed in the Court’s order raise issues of substantial importance to multiple agencies of the federal government, and the litigation histories and factual backgrounds of these cases are complex. The extension is necessary to ensure that the Solicitor General may determine with confidence whether and to what extent it is appropriate for the United States to express definitive views on the issues raised in the Court’s order and the parties’ briefs.1 >>

Dew's comments notwithstanding re limiting SG opinion to a definitional universe, the SG might actually have gone to the FDA and other interested govt agencies as above and maybe just maybe we will get some clarity on the intent of the HW laws. Regards, bp